The Virginia Lemon Law

Ok so the new motorcycle you brought home runs just fine for the first week or so, and then something breaks or doesn't act just the way you expect. The dealer tries tix it but it just continues and the bike spends more time at the dealers than under you on the road. Did you buy the lemon? The following is a true account, don't laugh it could happen to you.

"I really liked the CBR954RR so I decided to get one. I bought the bike hoping for the best and noticed right off the bat that the horn was defective and didn't work. No big deal, so I took it to the dealer and had the horn fixed.

A few days later I noticed the bike seemed to run pretty hot. I was sitting at a stoplight after riding for *maybe* 10-15 minutes and the bike was already up to 240, even though the fans came on at 212! That didn't seem right since my F4i's fans come on at 226 and it NEVER goes above 231.

So, I took the bike to the dealer and tell them that it appears to be overheating. They look at the bike, call me back the next day and say they couldn't get the problem to duplicate. I think no problem and I pick the bike back up.

Bike starts going up to the same temperature, this time I let it get to 245 degrees before turning the bike off. This doesn't seem right.

I called Honda customer service about the issue, they say they'll log my call but they can't do anything for me unless my bike hits at least the cutoff point where the red light comes on and starts flashing (251 degrees). I'm thinking, ok that's rather dumb but whatever.

I take the bike back to the dealer again with the same problem and they call me back the next day telling me they can't duplicate the problem again. Now I'm getting frustrated, as I can't even ride the bike without it duplicating every single time. The problem had been getting worse and worse and it started to get to the point where within 10-15 minutes of riding the bike would be up in the 240's.

So, I took the bike back to the dealer again and show them that the bike is overheating. I made sure the service manager, and a mechanic, came out and saw the bike at 240+ degrees. Both the service advisor and the mechanic agreed there was definitely a problem and took the bike again. Now is where things get very interesting.

I get a call the next day saying that my bike has been dropped and there was going to be an appraisal on the damage later. I was pretty mad but they seemed genuine about it and told me that not only will they fix the damage but they will also be making SURE that my overheating problem will be fixed no matter what before giving my bike back, even if they have to replace any part I want them to.

Well, just doing the appraisal and getting the parts and putting them on the bike took around 2 full weeks. THEN they decided to take a look at the overheating a problem and what did they do? You guessed it, called me back and said they couldn't duplicate the problem again, even though I made sure 2 people witnessed it while I was there!

I took the bike home again thinking, "Well maybe they replaced a part that fixed the problem, who knows?" and what happens, the bike overheats on my way home.

About a week later I have time to take it back to the dealer so I do, and this time I make sure the service manager is available. I tell him I want him to go on a ride with me so that he can see what's going on that the bike is overheating without heavy riding, and vouch for me, etc. He gets on a bike and off we go...2 miles up to the nearest gas station, hasn't overheated yet, hop back on and run to the next gas station, probably another 2 miles away, and lo and behold the bike is climbing quickly.

It gets to about 235 degrees in a matter of a few minutes and he decides we better go back to the dealer's lot so we don't get stranded. We do, and this time when we get back he gets out a digital camera and takes pictures of the bike hitting 251 degrees and all the red lights on and the temp gauge flashing, so we have proof.

Then I call Honda customer service - from the dealership - to log another call. The customer service rep I talked to was VERY rude to me and said that Honda would not take any responsibility for any of the problems my bike had and that it was all the dealers problem and they were obligated to fix it for me and if they didn't, then tough.

This seemed rather dumb to me so I immediately called the BBB and filed a complaint against the customer service office for bad customer service.

Then the service manager at the dealer called the Honda techs in California as well as the local Honda area rep. The Honda rep said he'd have to come out and look at the bike, and the dealer said they'd just have to wait for him to come out.

The Honda techs in California could not give the dealer *ANY* suggestions (other than what the dealer had already supposedly looked at) other than to make sure there was exactly 3.1 liters (or something like that) of coolant in the bike.

At this point - out of courtesy - the dealer had already replaced the thermostat just to see if that would fix it - which it didn't. So they decided to also flush the coolant and replace it, to make sure there wasn't an air bubble in the system. They did that which of course didn't fix the problem.

The Honda area rep whose name I will withhold, came out and test rode my bike for 15 minutes (while I wasn't there of course) and also said he could not get the problem to duplicate. The dealer called me back and told me to come pick up the bike, which I did.

I made it halfway home upon which time the bike started severely overheating again (over 240 degrees), and I turned right back around and dropped the bike back off at the dealer. They said they'd have to get the area rep back out to look at it again.

This time when the area rep came out I made sure I was there, and he took the bike out for a 45-minute ride. He came back and said that he was able to get it to overheat but only by holding the throttle at 5-6000 rpm for 10 minutes at a time and then it would start to overheat.

I explained how we already had pictures of the bike at 251 degrees, as well as the service manager and about 5 other mechanics and service advisors witnessing the problem. The area rep said he didn't care and that Honda would not support the problem unless *HE* could get it to duplicate. He then told me he had to leave and wouldn't be back to look at the bike again for at least a week or two.

I needed the bike back to go to Bike Week after that (not that same day, later in the week). I came to pick up the bike and guess what? There was a giant melted spot on the seat! At this point I told the dealer I was completely fed up with the service and the fact that they kept damaging my bike and told them I wouldn't be bringing the bike back to them.

After Bike Week (of course, the bike is still overheating every time I ride it), I decided to take the bike to a NEW dealer, which is about the same distance from my house.

I show up on the bike and make sure it is overheating when I drop it off, they acknowledge. They called me later and told me they thought the temperature sending unit is defective and the bike isn't actually overheating but just misreading the temperature.

So my hopes came up obviously. I waited a good week and a half at least for them to get the parts and put them on the bike...by this time the bike had been at this dealer + the other dealer for a collective total of 5 or so visits, and 60+ days.

They put the temperature-sending unit on and told me that the bike was fixed.

I picked up the bike and rode home...pulled into my drive way and low and behold the bike shoots back up to 240 degrees within minutes. Meanwhile I've already posted on sportbikes.ws and cycleforums.com to find out what the normal temperature cycle was for 954's and every single 954 rider said his bike had never gone above 225 in the worst absolute weather and circumstances.

By now I was just completely and utterly frustrated. I had taken the bike to 2 dealers 5 times, 55-60 days, the area rep had come out and seen the bike twice, and I had called Honda customer service twice, and still my bike is overheating and the dealer and Honda are blowing me off over and over.

I decided I would give the new dealer one more chance to fix my bike before I decided I had to try to pursue some sort of legal action against Honda and/or the dealer if I wanted any sort of resolution.

I brought my bike into the dealer again and they basically told me they couldn't really do anything else to the bike cause nothing else could be broken. That annoyed me quite a bit so I went directly to my sales person who is also the sales manager and relayed everything that I am relaying to you now, to him. He told me he'd talk to the service manager and try to get the priority upped on the bike.

So, I waited 2 days to hear word from the dealer on what was happening with my bike - nothing. I called them and asked what the deal was and the guy I talked to said that they were busy and they weren't even going to look at my bike for another week. Well that was the last straw for me.

I said thanks, called Honda customer service and told them this whole story from start to finish, then told them that they've left me no choice other than to seek legal consultation, and that if they didn't fix my bike or buy it back I would be consulting a lawyer. They said "whatever" and that was that.

I then called the dealer back and let the service manager know that if my bike wasn't worked on in a reasonable amount of time and fixed; I was going to seek legal action. His first words were "well if you're going to do that we're just not going to touch your bike. We'll just wait until you hire a lawyer and pass it off to Honda's legal department". He then told me that he was going to talk to the area rep again and see what he said.

I am in the process of waiting to hear from my lawyer...also I called the dealer back again today and they said that after talking to the Honda area rep again he said that the service manager should go on a long ride, 100+ miles, and see if he can get the bike to overheat to Honda's specs (he wouldn't even tell me what Honda's specs were - no temperatures or times or anything like that) and if he couldn't get it to overheat he should give me the bike back and cease to work on it.

So now I'm waiting to hear back from the service manager on whether or not he has gotten my 954 to overheat as well as from my lawyer to see if we can build up a case on this.

ALL I WANT IS MY BIKE FIXED! Is that too much to ask? If they can't fix the bike they should back their product and buy it back!"

I don't' have a clue where this poor rider lives or who the dealerships are he is working with but we here in Virginia are lucky enough to have some protection under the law, we have the Lemon Law and yes it does cover motorcycles.

Virginia Lemon Law

Title 59.1, Chapter 17.3, §59.1-207.9 - §59.1-207.16

VA - Office of Consumer Affairs

§ 59.1-207.9
This chapter may be cited as the Virginia Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act.

(1984, c. 773.)

§ 59.1-207.10
The General Assembly recognizes that a motor vehicle is a major consumer purchase, and there is no doubt that a defective motor vehicle creates a hardship for the consumer. It is the intent of the General Assembly that a good faith motor vehicle warranty complaint by a consumer should be resolved by the manufacturer, or its agent, within a specified period of time. It is further the intent of the General Assembly to provide the statutory procedures whereby a consumer may receive a replacement motor vehicle, or a full refund, for a motor vehicle which cannot be brought into conformity with the express warranty issued by the manufacturer. However, nothing in this chapter shall in any way limit the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.

(1984, c. 773.)

§ 59.1-207.11
As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

"Collateral charges" means any sales-related charges including but not limited to sales tax, license fees, registration fees, title fees, finance charges and interest, transportation charges, dealer preparation charges or any other charges for service contracts, undercoating, rust proofing or installed options, not recoverable from a third party.

"Comparable motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle that is identical or reasonably equivalent to the motor vehicle to be replaced, as the motor vehicle to be replaced existed at the time of purchase with an offset from this value for a reasonable allowance for its use.

"Consumer" means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle used in substantial part for personal, family, or household purposes, and any person to whom such motor vehicle is transferred for the same purposes during the duration of any warranty applicable to such motor vehicle, and any other person entitled by the terms of such warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty.

"Incidental damages" shall have the same meaning as provided in § 8.2-715.

"Lemon law rights period" means the period ending eighteen months after the date of the original delivery to the consumer of a new motor vehicle. This shall be the period during which the consumer can report any nonconformity to the manufacturer and pursue any rights provided for under this chapter.

"Lien" means a security interest in a motor vehicle.

"Lienholder" means a person, partnership, association, corporation or entity with a security interest in a motor vehicle pursuant to a lien.

"Manufacturer" means a person, partnership, association, corporation or entity engaged in the business of manufacturing or assembling motor vehicles, or of distributing motor vehicles to motor vehicle dealers.

"Manufacturer's express warranty" means the written warranty, so labeled, of the manufacturer of a new automobile, including any terms or conditions precedent to the enforcement of obligations under that warranty.

"Motor vehicle" means only passenger cars, pickup or panel trucks, motorcycles, self-propelled motorized chassis of motor homes and mopeds as those terms are defined in § 46.2-100 and demonstrators or lease purchase vehicles with which a warranty was issued.

"Motor vehicle dealer" shall have the same meaning as provided in § 46.2-1500.

"Nonconformity" means a failure to conform with a warranty, a defect or a condition, including those that do not affect the driveability of the vehicle, which significantly impairs the use, market value, or safety of a motor vehicle.

"Notify" or "notification" means that the manufacturer shall be deemed to have been notified under this chapter if a written complaint of the defect or defects has been mailed to it or it has responded to the consumer in writing regarding a complaint, or a factory representative has either inspected the vehicle or met with the consumer or an authorized dealer regarding the nonconformity.

"Reasonable allowance for use" shall not exceed one-half of the amount allowed per mile by the Internal Revenue Service, as provided by regulation, revenue procedure, or revenue ruling promulgated pursuant to § 162 of the Internal Revenue Code, for use of a personal vehicle for business purposes, plus an amount to account for any loss to the fair market value of the vehicle resulting from damage beyond normal wear and tear, unless the damage resulted from nonconformity to any warranty.

"Serious safety defect" means a life-threatening malfunction or nonconformity that impedes the consumer's ability to control or operate the new motor vehicle for ordinary use or reasonable intended purposes or creates a risk of fire or explosion.

"Significant impairment" means to render the new motor vehicle unfit, unreliable or unsafe for ordinary use or reasonable intended purposes.

"Warranty" means any implied warranty or any written warranty of the manufacturer, or any affirmations of fact or promise made by the manufacturer in connection with the sale of a motor vehicle that become part of the basis of the bargain. The term "warranty" pertains to the obligations of the manufacturer in relation to materials, workmanship, and fitness of a motor vehicle for ordinary use or reasonable intended purposes throughout the duration of the lemon law rights period as defined under this section.

(1984, c. 773; 1988, c. 603; 1990, c. 772; 1998, c. 671.)

§ 59.1-207.12
Conformity to all warranties

If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealer during the manufacturer's warranty period, the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer shall make such repairs as are necessary to conform the vehicle to such warranties, notwithstanding the fact that such repairs are made after the expiration of such manufacturer's warranty period.

(1984, c. 773; 1988, c. 603.)

§ 59.1-207.13
Nonconformity of motor vehicles

A. If the manufacturer, its agents or authorized dealers do not conform the motor vehicle to any applicable warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition, including those that do not affect the driveability of the vehicle, which significantly impairs the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts during the lemon law rights period, the manufacturer shall:

1. Replace the motor vehicle with a comparable motor vehicle acceptable to the consumer, or

2. Accept return of the motor vehicle and refund to the consumer and any lienholder as their interest may appear the full purchase price, including all collateral charges, incidental damages, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle up to the date of the first notice of nonconformity that is given to the manufacturer, its agents or authorized dealer. The consumer shall have the unconditional right to choose a refund rather than a replacement vehicle and to drive the motor vehicle until he receives either the replacement vehicle or the refund. The subtraction of a reasonable allowance for use shall apply to either a replacement or refund of the motor vehicle. Mileage, expenses, and reasonable loss of use necessitated by attempts to conform such motor vehicle to the express warranty may be recovered by the consumer.

B. It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to any warranty and that the motor vehicle is significantly impaired if during the period of eighteen months following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer either:

1. The same nonconformity has been subject to repair three or more times by the manufacturer, its agents or its authorized dealers and the same nonconformity continues to exist;

2. The nonconformity is a serious safety defect and has been subject to repair one or more times by the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer and the same nonconformity continues to exist; or

3. The motor vehicle is out of service due to repair for a cumulative total of thirty calendar days, unless such repairs could not be performed because of conditions beyond the control of the manufacturer, its agents or authorized dealers, including war, invasion, strike, fire, flood or other natural disasters.

C. The lemon law rights period shall be extended if the manufacturer has been notified but the nonconformity has not been effectively repaired by the manufacturer, or its agent, by the expiration of the lemon law rights period.

D. The manufacturer shall clearly and conspicuously disclose to the consumer, in the warranty or owner's manual, that written notification of the nonconformity to the manufacturer is required before the consumer may be eligible for refund or replacement of the vehicle under this chapter. The manufacturer shall include with the warranty or owner's manual the name and address to which the consumer shall send such written notification.

E. It shall be the responsibility of the consumer, or his representative, prior to availing himself of the provisions of this section, to notify the manufacturer of the need for the correction or repair of the nonconformity, unless the manufacturer has been notified as defined in § 59.1-207.11. If the manufacturer or factory representative has not been notified of the conditions set forth in subsection B of this section and any of the conditions set forth in subsection B of this section already exists, the manufacturer shall be given an additional opportunity, not to exceed fifteen days, to correct or repair the nonconformity. If notification shall be mailed to an authorized dealer, the authorized dealer shall upon receipt forward such notification to the manufacturer.

F. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit or impair the rights and remedies of a consumer under any other law.

G. It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this chapter that:

1. An alleged nonconformity does not significantly impair the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle; or

2. A nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect or unauthorized modification or alteration of a motor vehicle by a consumer.

(1984, c. 773; 1987, c. 607; 1988, c. 603; 1990, c. 772; 1998, c. 671.)

§ 59.1-207.14
Action to enforce provisions of chapter

Any consumer who suffers loss by reason of a violation of any provision of this chapter may bring a civil action to enforce such provision. Any consumer who is successful in such an action or any defendant in any frivolous action brought by a consumer shall recover reasonable attorney's fees, expert witness fees and court costs incurred by bringing such actions.

(1984, c. 773; 1988, c. 603.)

§ 59.1-207.15
Informal dispute settlement procedure

A. If a manufacturer provides an informal dispute settlement procedure, it shall be the consumer's choice whether or not to use it prior to availing himself of his rights under this chapter.

B. If a dispute settlement procedure is resorted to by the consumer and the decision is for a refund or a comparable motor vehicle, the manufacturer shall have forty days from its receipt of the consumer's acceptance of the decision or from the date of a court order to comply with the terms of the decision.

C. In any action brought because of the manufacturer's failure to comply with the decision, within the scope of the procedure's authority, rendered as a result of a dispute resolution proceeding or a court order, the court may triple the value of the award stipulated in the decision as provided for in this chapter, plus award other equitable relief the court deems appropriate, including additional attorney's fees.

(1988, c. 603; 1990, c. 772.)

§ 59.1-207.16
Action to be brought within certain time

Any action brought under this chapter shall be commenced within the lemon law rights period following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer; however, any consumer whose good faith attempts to settle the dispute have not resulted in the satisfactory correction or repair of the nonconformity, replacement of the motor vehicle or refund to the consumer of the amount described in subdivision 2 of subsection A of § 59.1-207.13, shall have twelve months from the date of the final action taken by the manufacturer in its dispute settlement procedure or within the lemon law rights period, whichever is longer, to file an action in the proper court, provided the consumer has rejected the manufacturer's final action.

(1988, c. 603; 1990, c. 772; 1999, c. 387.)

§ 59.1-207.16:1
Disclosure of returned vehicles; penalty.

A. If a motor vehicle that is returned to the manufacturer or distributor either under this chapter or by judgment, decree, or arbitration award in this or any other state and is then transferred by a manufacturer or distributor to a dealer, licensed under Chapter 15 (§ 46.2-1500 et seq.) of Title 46.2, in Virginia, the manufacturer or distributor shall disclose this information to the Virginia dealer.

B. If the returned vehicle is then made available for resale or for another lease, the manufacturer shall, prior to sale or lease, disclose in writing in a clear and conspicuous manner, on a separate piece of paper in ten-point capital type, to the Virginia dealer that this motor vehicle was returned to the manufacturer, distributor or factory branch, the nature of the defect which resulted in the return, and the condition of the motor vehicle at the time of transfer to the Virginia dealer. It shall be the responsibility of the dealer that receives this disclosure to give notice of its contents to any prospective purchaser or lessee prior to sale or lease, and to transfer the disclosure, or a copy thereof, to the next purchaser or lessee. A dealer's responsibility under this section shall cease upon the sale or lease of the affected motor vehicle to the first purchaser or lessee not for resale or lease.

C. Any manufacturer or distributor who violates this section of the Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.

(1994, c. 578; 1998, c. 671.)

The Biker eNews is a non-profit public service for the Tidewater and Peninsular Motorcycle Community. We are not affiliated with any organization or business. The Biker eNews is owned, operated and paid for by Phillip Floria. We accept no commercial advertising; our links are links of interest for motorcycle enthusiasts.

Back